Create a project, name your tender exercise, and drop all supplier submission folders in. Each supplier appears in your sidebar with real-time scanning progress as the system analyses every document — certificates, financials, questionnaires, NDAs — simultaneously.
Certificates cross-referenced against UKAS and IASME registers. Turnover checked against Companies House. Insurance policies verified. Contradictions caught across separate documents. Your team sees a complete compliance picture before reading a single page.
Each issue comes with a pre-drafted clarification email written in the right procurement tone. Send it directly through your e-tendering portal. Track the supplier's response in the same thread. Close with an auditable note when resolved.
Assign questions to your evaluation panel. Each evaluator scores independently — no one sees other scores until all have submitted. Then everything reveals simultaneously and the consensus score emerges. No anchoring bias. No groupthink.
Before your evaluators score, let Ask John's AI review each response — trained to spot missing evidence, unquantified claims, benefit gaps, and criteria language mismatches. Evaluators see the AI's highlights and choose what to accept. Faster to score, nothing missed.
Three gated stages: compliance must clear before quality scoring begins, quality must complete before commercial opens. Every action logged, every decision documented, every score justified. Ready for scrutiny under the Procurement Act 2023.
From project creation to award — the complete evaluation lifecycle